Cute Cheap Chick

Ads Cutecheapchick Sk Contactus Cute Cheap Chick HONDA CBX 1000 Motorcycle Engine Assembly | Cheap Motorcycle Helmets

Ads Cutecheapchick Sk Contactus Cute Cheap Chick

  • Contactus s Contactus a Contactus c Cutecheapchick e Cutecheapchick e Ads r Cutecheapchick h Contactus usearchesearche Ads csearchA Ads ssearchi Ads Ads dsearch Contactus u o Cutecheapchick tsearchcu Contactus c Contactus e Contactus rh Cutecheapchick ssearcha Cutecheapchick c Cutecheapchick p Ads e Cutecheapchick rcsearchh Contactus d Contactus search Ct Ads c Cutecheapchick e Ads p Ads hiksearch Ads C Contactus n Ads a Ads tusearch s Ads eea Cutecheapchick csearch esearchisearchw
  • HJC Helmet Reviews
  • ICON Helmet Reviews
  • Joe Rocket Helmet Reviews
  • KBC Helmet Reviews
  • NITRO Helmet Reviews
  • Schuberth Helmet Reviews
  • Scorpion Helmet Reviews
  • Shark Helmet Reviews
  • SHOEI Helmet Reviews
  • SUOMY Helmet Reviews
  • Vemar Helmet Reviews
  • About
  • Recent Articles



  • HONDA CBX 1000 Motorcycle Engine Assembly


    A Povray created video of the assembly of the famous 6 cylinder Honda CBX-1000 motorcycle engine.

    Incoming searches:

    CBX 1000 HELMET, cbx1000 engine buy

    Videos |

    , , , , ,

    25 Responses to “HONDA CBX 1000 Motorcycle Engine Assembly”

    1. highmileage77 says:

      This cute, sarcastic joke of a comment implies that the bike is wide.

      While it does look wide, by moving the alternator and ignition from the ends of the crankshaft to a jackshaft behind the cylinders – a practice that is now common but began with the revolutionary CBX design, the overall width of the CBX is no more than other bikes.

    2. GodStink says:

      Hard to find stats on the width, but one site lists the engine alone as 585mm wide … almost double the frame width of an R1, and certainly a whole lot more than either of my bikes
      While I appreciate you love your ride, you need to grow a sense of humour

    3. highmileage77 says:

      Okay, perhaps I should have said ‘the overall width… is no more than other bikes of the period’. Comparing it to an R1 is ridiculous – incidentally, your R-1 has its accessories mounted on a jackshaft, too, as was first done on the CBX.

      I have quite a sense of humor, I just haven’t found anything you said funny. At least, not yet.

    4. KillTheNightwatch says:

      Waoh!!! 5/5

    5. GodStink says:

      OTHER bikes of the period? How about a Ducati 888? Or my GS450? Care to qualify the statement again? XD
      How about you just butch up and admit that it’s a wide ass bike and you can’t get around that. Personally, I don’t mind – it’s a cool ass ride and I’d have one … I just think it’s bloody wide
      I don’t have an R-1 either cos I’ve got taste

    6. highmileage77 says:

      Now you are just being argumentative. The CBX was not a Ducati nor a pansy-ass bike like a GS450.

      Those who ride understand the point I was making. Although the CBX motor looks extremely wide, it is no wider overall than the KZ 1000′s or GS 1100′s that were it’s competition.

      You were the one who compared it to an R1, hence I assumed that you might ride one.

      But I agree with you that a CBX is a ‘cool ass’ ride.

      No one would ever say that of a GS450…

    7. GodStink says:

      Now you’re just being a poor loser …
      You said ANY bike so I d the width of a popular bike and you were wrong. Then you said any bike of the era so I listed a couple and you were wrong. Now you’re comparing it to one of the few other 6 cylinder bikes … where will it end?
      It LOOKS wide cos it IS wide … grow a sack, admit it, laugh at your eclectic taste in bikes and stop trying to prove it’s something it’s not!
      PS. who cares what people say – I’d rather ride the GS than walk

    8. villacinca says:

      Does anybody knows why they stop producting six cylinder bikes?The only new its a suzuki prototype…Was a matter of cost or it has to do with the way the bikes behave?thanx

    9. highmileage77 says:

      You obviously know nothing about bikes.

      The KZs and GSes that I mentioned are fours. If you knew ANYTHING at all about bikes you would have known that.

      I’ll bet that not only do you ride a kid’s sized bike but you probably squat to pee, too. And your other bike must be a Schwinn.

      I’m done with you and this thread.

      But I must say that reading where a worthless wuss loser such as you has told me to grow a sack – now that is funny!

    10. GodStink says:

      Are you sure, Mr.Know-it-all? KZ1300 was a 6 cylinder … GS450 was a twin but the bigger ones were I4′s yeah.
      Obviously, if you’re resorting to childish name calling I’m not going to list my bikes here.

      So final score then – the CBX is WIDE and you’re a crybaby.

      Villacinca – more cylinder was a lo-tech way to make more power. Complex and expensive to build & maintain, they don’t bother with it anymore (except in like Goldwings) cos you can make more power with 4, 3 or 2 cylinders – cheaply.

    11. rikwatson200 says:

      most likely it was cost but remember the CBX is nearly 40 years old and in that time theyve developed 4 cyl and even some 2 cyl bikes that have more power, torque, are smoother and more economical

    12. kino261988 says:

      1-5-3-6-2-4, nice firing order!!!